Friday, October 14, 2016

Current Status of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

The civilian application of drones is a quickly emerging addition to the aviation industry. The possibility of having an unmanned, relatively cheap to use, aerial vehicle poses a lot of opportunities for a very wide number of civilian companies.  It is currently difficult to find companies that are commercially using drones. That can be attributed to the current regulations set forth by the FAA, with the one main restriction requiring line of sight operations. The Federal Aviation Regulations (2016) state:

With vision that is unaided by any device other than corrective lenses, the remote pilot in command, the visual observer (if one is used), and the person manipulating the flight control of the small unmanned aircraft system must be able to see the unmanned aircraft throughout the entire flight. (p.299)

The majority of businesses who have high hopes of integrating UAV’s into their operations are waiting patiently for the FAA to update the regulations on UAV flight to allow a more practical use, and eliminating the line of sight requirement. This process has begun, and is currently in motion. The FAA has already issued exemptions to a few companies. These companies are Trimble Navigation Limited, VDOS Global, Clayco Inc. and Woolpert Inc. These companies are using drones to, “conduct aerial surveys, monitor construction sites and inspect oil flare stacks.” (Jansen, 2014) The research gathered, regarding the four companies is a couple years old, so there very well may be more companies commercially utilizing UAV’s, but it is still very limited. The current regulations on small unmanned aircraft systems are presented in Part 107 of the Federal Aviation Regulations. These regulations require the following:

·         The remote pilot must have been issued a remote pilot certificate
·         The max take-off weight of the Small UAS may not exceed 55 pounds
·         Visual line of sight operation is required
·         Flight during the periods of civil twilight is prohibited, unless the UAV has lighted anti-collision lights visible for 3 statute miles
·         The operator must comply with alcohol and drug provisions of part 91.17 and 91.19
·         A person with a known physical or mental medical condition that can interfere with safety of flight, may not operate
·         Operation from a moving vehicle is not allowed, unless the aircraft is flown over a sparsely populated area
·         The altitude of the UAV cannot exceed 400ft AGL, unless in close proximity to a building or structure, where it is then allowed to be 400 feet above the structure.

I most definitely see UAV’s entering the National Airspace System. It is already being done in many other countries around the world, and the process is in motion in the United States. Based on the regulations already established, it looks like they idea is to integrate the UAV’s into the airspace, but to keep them at lower altitudes. Keeping the unmanned aircraft at lower altitudes provides separation between them, and the much larger aircraft operating in the airspace above. I think the problems that will arise, will stem from the overwhelming ambition of the many civilian companies who intend on integrating these UAV’s into their business. What the FAA is currently doing, is slowly entering the small UAS’s into the airspace, but once it is ok for any business with the means to incorporate drones to do so, they will be everywhere. Behind every one of these aircraft, will be a brand new remote pilot. This increases the opportunity for exception amounts of human error.

UAV’s have had numerous military applications which have transformed military strategy. This transformation is nothing too new, as the first applications began in World War 2, with the German V-1 flying bomb, which was reverse engineered by the United States, to create an almost identical counterpart. The significance of this transformation is that the military was able to take their pilots out of the danger, and deliver very destructive bombs to their destination. To fast forward to Desert Storm, UAV’s played an important role by emerging, “as a critical tool for gathering intelligence at the tactical level. These systems were employed for battlefield damage assessment, targeting, and surveillance missions, particularly in high-threat airspace.” (Miller, 2013) So all these advancements have allowed the military to have UAV’s complete tasks and missions that were previously carried out by manned aircraft. This inserts a higher level of safety, while not hindering the military strategy at all.

There are jobs currently being offered for UAV pilots. These positions are available for people with wide ranges of experience, with the most stringent one requiring the Part 107 certificate, a PPL, a Bachelors degree, and at least 3 years of multi-rotor experience. The laxest of the positions is asking for a high school diploma, the part 107 certificate, and for the pilot to own his, or her own UAV. The links to these positions are listed below:





References:

Aviation Supplies and Academics. (2016). Far aim. Newcastle, WA.
Jansen, B. (2014).  FAA lets 4 companies fly commercial drones. Retrieved fromhttp://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2014/12/10/faa-drones-trimble-vdos-clayco-woolpert-amazon/20187761/   

Miller, J. (2013). Strategic significance of drone operations for warfare. Retrieved from http://www.e-ir.info/2013/08/19/strategic-significance-of-drone-operations-for-warfare/

8 comments:

  1. I liked that you talked about the V1 rocket as a precursor to drones, while it was a terrible weapon used against the Allies in WW2, it truly was the first instance of an automated system being used in combat to reduce the risk to it's user. I think we don't really make the connection between guided weapons and drones because while drones are recoverable, a guided weapon like the Tomahawk cruise missile for instance, is fire and forget. Even though after it's target is selected it navigates itself there with little to no human input.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I liked that you talked about the V1 rocket as a precursor to drones, while it was a terrible weapon used against the Allies in WW2, it truly was the first instance of an automated system being used in combat to reduce the risk to it's user. I think we don't really make the connection between guided weapons and drones because while drones are recoverable, a guided weapon like the Tomahawk cruise missile for instance, is fire and forget. Even though after it's target is selected it navigates itself there with little to no human input.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I liked that you talked about the V1 rocket as a precursor to drones, while it was a terrible weapon used against the Allies in WW2, it truly was the first instance of an automated system being used in combat to reduce the risk to it's user. I think we don't really make the connection between guided weapons and drones because while drones are recoverable, a guided weapon like the Tomahawk cruise missile for instance, is fire and forget. Even though after it's target is selected it navigates itself there with little to no human input.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree with all three of Eriks comments. Drones have been around for a very long time, and while they are just as annoying in the military to manned aircraft as they are in the civilian world, they really do have excellent uses that take humans out of danger that are still devastating to the enemy. Its crazy to think that some of the drones operating on the battlefield are being controlled by service members in Las Vegas, thousands of miles from the dangerous conditions.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Interesting Blog Post. I would agree with you that the commercial applications of drones are becoming more practical as the FAA slowly moves to create new regulations and exemptions for the UAV operators. The only concern I have with UAVs operating inside the NAS is the potential risk it presents to the other manned aircraft operating in the NAS. As you pointed out, the UAVs will be at a fairly lower altitude that the other “heavy” aircraft operating in the same airspace, however, I still would like to see some kind of proposed safety system where the pilots and UAV operators are given a more direct line of communication if the UAVs are to be used in the same airspace as other manned aircraft. While the lower operating altitudes of the UAVs wouldn’t seem to pose any real threat to the other manned aircraft, I think the operation of UAVs at these lower altitudes becomes dangerous when you start operating these UAVs near the airport environment where manned aircraft are operating at lower altitudes for landings.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I agree with your post. I would like to add that even though UAV jobs are difficult to come by, there are many opportunities out there. FAA exemptions are being added for companies nation wide, and even here in the Detroit area there are many companies hiring UAV certified pilots for real estate photography. I also agree that UAVs are becoming more popular and their use is increasing. This is a large safety concern for aviation especially in high traffic areas. I do believe that the FAA will create more restrictions like you stated. Eventually UAVs will fully be integrated into the NAS once enough rules and restrictions are set. I'm curious to see how the FAA reacts to the increase in drone use.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I disagree with you. I do not believe that UAVs will be integrated into the NAS, until technology advances to a point in which drones can be used safely. Current civilian drones are just really expensive toys with limited range and because of their size, it can be difficult for pilots to spot a drone before something bad happens. Drone operators safely pilot from the ground, while pilots are in the air. If there was a collision between a drone and an aircraft, the pilot and their passengers are the ones at risk of losing their lives.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Dan,
    Although i do agree that drones will eventually be integrated into the NAS, i dont think it will be very soon. We have seen that the FAA doesnt act fast when trying to get things done (NEXTGEN) Also there is no way, as on right now, for drones pilots to communicate with ATC. This must happen in order for aicraft to be able to maintain separation. Until then, i cant see drones becoming a part of the NAS

    ReplyDelete